- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- HMAK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. I can't find anything in secondary sources on HMAK. Everything in article is based on his own website. Bbb23 (talk) 15:59, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - my search didn't reveal the degree of independent note or record contracts or chart positions, that would qualify this musician for a wikipedia BLP - Youreallycan (talk) 16:10, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Non-notable. 76.248.147.199 (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't show any evidence of meeting our notability requirements. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete yes there is not established WP:Notability and none of WP:Reliable sources are available. Justice007 (talk) 20:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- For the sake of completeness, this article was mentioned on the biographies of living persons noticeboard by a user who claimed to know the subject, and who said the article was defamatory. The article was in a vandalized state, so I reverted back to a much shorter version that was a year older, and this is the version that was nominated. You can look at subsequent versions in the article history if you wish to see how the article developed. Having said all that, I agree the subject does not meet Wikipedia standards for notability under WP:GNG or WP:BAND, and the article should be deleted. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non note. Quinn ➳WINDY 19:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - musician with no credible assertion of notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - A7 per Orangemike, so tagged. ukexpat (talk) 19:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.